Andrew James John Mackenzie
an historiography
Home
Blog
Photos
CV
Contact Me
January, 2012
February, 2012
April, 2012
June, 2012
July, 2012
August, 2012
September, 2012
October, 2012
November, 2012
December, 2012
January, 2013
February, 2013
March, 2013
April, 2013
May, 2013
June, 2013
July, 2013
August, 2013
September, 2013
October, 2013
November, 2013
December, 2013
January, 2014
February, 2014
March, 2014
April, 2014
May, 2014
June, 2014
July, 2014
August, 2014
September, 2014
October, 2014
November, 2014
December, 2014
January, 2015
February, 2015
April, 2015
May, 2015
June, 2015
July, 2015
August, 2015
September, 2015
October, 2015
November, 2015
December, 2015
January, 2016
February, 2016
April, 2016
May, 2016
June, 2016
July, 2016
August, 2016
September, 2016
October, 2016
November, 2016
December, 2016
January, 2017
March, 2017
June, 2017
Loot; War Trophies and Victory Souvenirs


Combatants fight for something. Freedom, conquest, political and social transformation. Each is different and each is unique in scope. On a more micro level, soldiers will fight for one another, for personal creeds and moralities and, indeed, even for their own personal gain. The victors are often depicted with the spoils of war, the systematic accumulation of enemy materials, munitions and iconography. Historically, since the Greco-Romano period, military victories and occupations have been marked with war trophies. War in the modern era is no exception. The acquittal of SAS Sgt. Danny Nightingale highlights the continued fascination with acquiring and collecting battlefield souvenirs.

According to Maj. Gen. Julian Thompson, a veteran of the Falklands war, the need to collect enemy materials as battle mementos is an “irresistible urge” for many soldiers for it is linked in human nature:
 
"War trophies go back to when we were all running around in skins, or not even dressed in anything at all, and you took something from your enemy - his best stone axe - and waved it around in the air to proclaim dominance."  
 

Following the cessation of hostilities on the Falklands Islands, soldiers were ordered to dispose of the ‘mementoes’ collected whilst on tour. Thompson contends that the practice was so rife amongst British troops that "[t]he night before we arrived home the whole ship was surrounded by splashes as the pistols went overboard." His experiences of that particular conflict and the practice of war trophies is one of consternation:

 
"What you can't do and what is totally illegal is to steal things off people. If you capture someone and he's got a gold cross round his neck, to steal that as a personal possession is totally wrong."
 

In the recent conflicts of Iraq and Afghanistan there is no exception to the major’s ruling. Sgt. Joseph Coyne, 1st Battalion, Royal Irish Regiment, related his own battlefield experiences, capturing a Taliban flag with Islamic prayer scripture:
 

"We had an area to our east that we couldn't really patrol. Eventually when we did push forward we identified that it was a Taliban flag and just ripped it down. It's a show of presence that they had got rule of that area if the flag was flying, so we just took it down and kept hold of it."
 


Source: Imperial War Museum


The case of Sgt. Danny Nightingale, who was sentenced to 18 months' military detention for keeping a 9mm Glock pistol he says was given as a present in Iraq, highlights a different concern - weapons as war trophies. Ministry of Defence policies concerning the aerial transport of these items are as stringent as those found within civilian circles, troops must comply with the same rules and procedures found on commercial flights. However, requests can be made to superior officers and items allowed for travel are governed on a case by case basis, depending on the item in question, its use and its associated risks posed to others in civilian life. Completely deactivated weapons can be brought back for instance, but an application must still be made to higher command.

 
Following the experiences of Sgt. Nightingale, soldiers are perhaps a little bit more concerned about bringing such controversial items back into the UK from overseas theatres of war. Thompson believes that "It's less prevalent than it used to be because the rules have got stricter over the years," resulting in the various brushes of the law for both returning soldiers and their families.
 

Despite these certain disincentives, there will always be a fascination with collecting military materials. Military historian, Dr. Peter Caddick-Adams, contends that for as long as there is warfare and combatants in service, there will always be a need and a desire for trophies of war providing they are not offensive nor dangerous:
 

"The taking home of perfectly innocent trophies has always been part of military history and always will be in the future."
 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Imperial War Museum (IWM), http://www.iwm.org.uk/collections-research.Copyright © IWM 2012.
 
All copyrighted material used in this article or cited by this website is the property of their respective owners and ajjmackenzie.co.uk in no way accepts any responsibility for an infringement on one of the above.
 
<< Back Add New Comment
0 items total
Add New Comment
Name*
Subject*
Comment*
Please type the confirmation code you see on the image*
Reload image
HomeBlogPhotosCVContact Me